Welcome to /pol/, the official board for political discussion on masterchan. I would recommend reading the FAQ before posting, so you know what is on-topic (and, of course, what is not.)
>>6223 wot
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/delay-fbi-ready-to-indict-hillary/article/2581404 FBI ready to put Hillary on trial, or go public with the information if the attorney general does not indict. It turns out the reptilian power is not absolute.
>>6308 I'm sure they all crave that "intelligence" the NSA provides. And free speech is a threat to every single one of them.
>>6303 If you became president and the head of the NSA came to you and gave you the list of all the groups threatening the United States in this very moment, you wouldn't think twice before telling him to just "do everything necessary to stop them".
>>6340 That implies so much bullshit I don't know where to start.
>>6341 You may begin.
>>6340 Can't do politics in absolutes
>Let's make America the country that cures cancer So considering Obama's record, this means Obama is going to make cancer as bad as it's ever been?
>>6219 >lurk until you've learnt the basics of kikery in medicine You mean like how bipolar, psychosis, dementia, etc aren't real organic disorders? I'm sure if you just forced yourself to stop being a retard/nigger then, you, too, could be a millionaire. Or tranny.
>>6219 Your thread was moved to Off Topic as per the FAQ: >If a thread's premise only fosters one point of view... it is recommended that it is posted in Off Topic. Your thread seemed to create no real discussion. It just seemed to create a circlejerk. Keep in mind that this is Politics and not Politically Incorrect. It isn't just about one political view.
Fried Fat and all those other things existed long before there was a so-called NWO controlled media /fast food etc. maybe buy some of alex jones water purifiers.................?
>>6366 He does have a point. Compared to some euro countries, the US has really low standards when it comes to what you can add into food and a few other things. All these things could be carcinogens and no ones going to prove it either way because studies with unfavorable results simply arent published, and rat biology isnt 1:1 with humans, especially when it comes to carcinogens, radiation, and alcohol which rats are resilient to. Then there's shady things like the US changing radiation testing of livestock from every day to once a month after the fukushima disaster to not have it effect sales.
https://youtu.be/fYOORimbpUs >white men are the devil! >help white men do something, we are being raped >men should be masculine and protect the women! This is hilarious
>refugees welcome! Bigots go away! >literal rape culture imported from the middle east >women who called western men on rape culture now want men to get rid of the imported rape culture for them You do it this time women. Figure out how to deal with the Muslims. They won't mess with us men, so it's your problem. Be strong and independent.
>They won't mess with us men What? Mudslimes have no issue killing men.
>>6353 You should put that on MGTOW. (I do agree with you, though).
>>6353 (I'm >>6363) Also since we're so disgraceful and woman are so strong and independent, I'd say let them deal with it. I wouldn't move a finger to help any woman.
Watched it now. Seems the feminazi is NOT the one saying >help white men do something, we are being raped >men should be masculine and protect the women! Unless the blonde german is a feminazi, though she seems to not like them. Anyway, when did Russia start becoming a country of faggots? I'm surprised RT is sprouting feminazi buzzwords. Next they'll be having their soldiers in high heels.
2016 American election thread
>>6327 Watched it and it looks like the counters are making up numbers and inflating how many voted for Hillary. I've heard rumors that one of then worked for her campaign but no proof yet.
I lost hope in democrats and republicans. Many democrats are SJWs/Feminists that will bend over to Black Lives Matter (Bernie). Many republicans are too religious and/or anti-privacy (Bush). That being said, I will probably vote for Trump 2016. I don't plan on living in America for the rest of my life.
>>6330
>>6335 sorry new to this site. Trump hopefully will win, he'll tear apart Shillary and Bernie better then Cruz can. Best case scenario is Trump v. Hillary because i can guess a ton of bern fans will vote trump out of spite
https://youtu.be/W4avdFNP5t8 Are people raising up to the fact that Tax money, taken from workers, are given to people who don't work? Will people start being more conscious of this, instead of thinking everything can be free and nobody has to pay for it? I don't see what is so wrong here though. They collect welfare, allegedly, because they don't have a monthly income, but they used some cash they had (acquired maybe from some odd job) for a lottery ticked. But the message of being responsible with tax money is important.
There are four standard, obfuscating tenets that ruling propertied classes have employed throughout the ages to cloak their narrowly selfish class interests: First, the oligarchic clique represents its own privileged interests as equivalent to the general interest. The argument is that the well being of the country and the entire society depends on the well being of the prominent few, whose high station gives proof of their deserving excellence, and who portray themselves as presiding wisely over public affairs. Second, ruling-class protagonists warn that such things as welfare, rent and price controls, “lenient” bankruptcy laws and the like undermine the moral fiber of those indigent who benefit from such misguided and unmerited assistance, at the expense of the more responsible, deserving elements of society, thus effectively creating class rivalry among classes of their subjects. Third, ruling elites assert that redistributive social programs create a ruinous burden upon the entire society. They claim there is not enough money for social subsidies, (even for self-financing programs such as Social Security and Medicare, in our culture) or for public works projects that would offer employment to hard-up working people. No notice is ever taken that there is always enough to finance war and massive public subsidies to the wealthiest stratum. Fourth, when the oligarchs are unable to attack popular reforms that bridle their own overweening greed, they attack the reformers and their motives. Invariably they portray mass agitation not as righteous resistance to economic injustice but as “class war”, the work of unscrupulous, unstable, self-aggrandizing and power hungry demagogues who exploit the mindless passions of the unsophisticated multitude. See how many of these you can spot in the 2016 election cycle.
I'd like to see states start making people on welfare start having to take drug test to be eligible for well fare. I'm a union electrician and have to get drug test all the time, but the people abusing the system don't have to do any type of testing but get their well fare. It just doesn't seem right that the working class have to make sure they keep their jobs in line to pay for those who are sacking off the system and getting high with tax payers dollars
>>6320 >>I'd like to see states start making people on welfare start having to take drug test to be eligible for well fare. I'm a union electrician Just because union gangsters took away your freedom doesn't mean everyone else has submit to the same bleak future you subscribe to.
>>6105 >I live in a flyover state where there are no projects or low income housing complexes.
>>6344 >flyover state Yeah, the airplanes fly right over us and into your buildings.
>Mother of ten-year-old boy raped in Austrian swimming pool by Iraqi who said it was 'a sexual emergency' says she regrets telling her children 'migrants need our help' http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3436988/Mother-ten-year-old-boy-raped-Austrian-swimming-pool-Iraqi-said-sexual-emergency-says-regrets-telling-children-migrants-need-help.html
>/pol/cucks will still defend women after this
>>6347 who ever defends women on a chan?
>>6349 If they're 2D. Otherwise, all 3D women are considered beneath penis-wielders even if it's comparing NEETs to attorneys. Turbobeta nigger males are always superior to the highest females.
>>6347 But it was a man who raped the lad. Moms knows better know.
>>6356 I blame Jesus for that.
I can't trust anything that wants me to get into receiving buttsex position.
DARPA are really shitty at telling lies. http://www.icahdq.org/membersnewsletter/NOV14_ART0009.asp#.VFjjb9QtWjw.twitter >This harassment isn't new. For years now, women working in the video game industry and women participants in gaming culture who have been critical of the climate in game development and culture have been frequent targets of vicious attacks and, at times, outright threats. Past incidents such as the "Dickwolves" controversy, the #1reasonwhy hashtag, and public attacks on women developers point to an industry that has long kept women at the margins - both as professionals in the industry and as game players. So while this story seems new, the threats towards feminist cultural critics and women game designers are the result of a decade (or more) of culturally endorsed harassment, bullying, and abuse. An extensive number of articles (both academic and nonacademic) have illustrated this history. If you would like to read more on the topic we recommend http://fembotcollective.org/references-for-gamergate/:ICA members need to be aware that GamerGate is about more than the videogame industry and its players -- scholars are also the target of harassment. In August, members of the 4chan IRC community who coordinated conspiracy theories about Quinn discovered a public Google document with notes from this year's Digital Games Research Association's (DiGRA) conference fishbowl event about diversity and gaming. The notes became an important node in a conspiracy theory linking journalists and academics. Several YouTube videos were created that misquote the fishbowl notes and accuse members of the DiGRA organization (and, in particular, those doing gender-related research) of plotting to overtake and destroy the current video game industry by inserting a "social justice agenda" into game design
(text too long)
>>5732 >What is forcing anyone to play? Nothing, but how are you going to know their terms of service before buying? Are you gonna read the terms of service for every game out there? This is not practical to life in society
http://www.pcgamesn.com/heroes-of-the-storm/heroes-of-the-storm-introduces-new-punishments-for-reported-players-as-rexxar-is-released >Abusive Chat >Insults, cruelty, or ongoing harassment directed at one or more players. >Hate speech For years we've deal with this simply by ignoring an user. Now it is not enough, game companies have to punish players who are offensive. A whole generation of teens (including women now that are playing MOBAS a lot) raised on these beliefs. God have mercy on our souls
>>3985 >>3985 >>3985 >>3985
>>3745 >Don't criticize the SJWs, goyim! It'll just make things worse! Yes, ignoring them for decades before they turned to vidya really worked in stopping their onslaught.
>>5708 It's unfortunate, but probably is time to move on. It's not just SJWs and the shit the push (like censorship) but all the anti-consumer practices in general. I don't know if you only buy on steam, but I avoid it as I want my shit DRM-free. What I've discovered while buying games off of steam though is that support is fucking awful. I've bought unreleased games that got finished, but the dev decided it was too much work to release the finished version off of steam and thus am stuck with an early alpha version. I've bought finished games that end up not getting patches or DLC released where I bought it. I've given money to a game on kickstarter that said it would be DRM-free, just for it to go steam-only. I typically end up just pirating these games I own already in order to get patches and DLC that I can't even buy. And that's just games I own, I've seen plenty of devs that do this shit that I, thankfully, avoided. Now I just pirate to start with, why buy the game to begin with if I'm going to have to pirate it regardless. The pirates offer better support than the companies making the game. Then there is all the cut content DLC, unfinished games. There's fucking Day -1 DLC now, early access DLC. Desura and Shinyloot closing down will show how devs plan on handling those situations. I imagine it will be poorly. SJWs are just the nail in the coffin. I've been sticking to older games recently. Don't trust anything from 2015 onwards, excluding a few games.
>Anonymous targets Saudi websites as teen awaits crucifixion for ‘anti-govt activities’ http://www.rt.com/news/316621-anonymous-targets-saudi-websites-nimr/
>>5998 This, Anonymous are a bunch of roleplaying 2cool4school kiddies, neckbeards and SJWs. This is what is known as a "safe rebellion," or if you want to use some more conspiracy theorist-esque terminology, "controlled opposition."
>>6014 That's all you see, because you don't see anyone who actually maintains anonymity. Nice strawman.
>>5833 Nowadays "Anonymous" is nothing but people who know how to work microphones, voice changing and tone changing programs. All they do is loop very old footage of the actual Anon and put different "speeches" over it. >>5833
>>5833 Sorry OP, a bunch of Maskfags with a Google Plus account harldy makes something thread worthy, besides the fact that many chums with bitch about anonymous for being dumb as hell
>>6222 >>6338 >strawman >outlanders
>christians acting like jesus this I would actually like because they rarely do >jews acting like.. moses? who the hell are they trying to be? >muslims acting like muhammed and here you have islamic terrorism
I don't have issue with this and if u do same can be said about most Americans and English man do Americans abide by native Americans/ Alaskan laws of the land or English or Scottish follow welsh customs, laws no they were just immigrants to country made there own laws and punish those who don't follow.
I would argue that imposing on anyone is impolite and wtf why would you be impolite to someone wtf is wrong with you.
Why would a school take kids to get raped for a field trip?
>>6304 >Colorado Yes
Why is atheism bad if you still keep your culture, traditions, and history? Why does the vitality and integrity of a people hinge upon believing that a supernatural entity or entities keeps it all going? Or the stubborness thereof of fervent belief in intangible sky men? Why not stubborn belief in your own kind and ways, against those who wish to usurp your history and people's way of life? If you remember your enemy, pass on your ways, what's the problem? What if you keep foreign influence and peoples out of your society? Seriously, what is wrong with atheism when the predominant Euro religion, kikestianity the semite's slave's religion, has hunted down and killed our ancestor's natural traditions? It destroyed the memory and physical temples of our gods and replaced them with sandnigger ones fashioned by our own means, and somewhat theirs (jews can't build steel beams). They also cut down natural monuments such as Yggdrasil, and have obfuscated the Bosnian pyramid, and washed over or tried to destroy historical records such as fair-skin, fair-haired people traversing the globe by sea and creating civilisations by the industrious inclinations of their own. So many records mention them. Why are they selectively omitted? Such elimination contingencies did not destroy our spirit or memory completely. It can be overturned, by the same destructive means, if necessary, by the same method the semitic "christian" religion overturned ours. We can also revert to the teachings and fables of Odin/Wotan/Woden, depending on your language and geographical heritage, and spread them to return to European greatness and remove all Asiatic influence. Asiatics seek only to elevate themselves and reduce all others. Their culture is foreign. They want to elevate themselves by any means, and reduce all others. This includes mudslimes, chinks, nips, russkies, mudslimes, pakis, indians, etc. They are all strongly nationalists and racist. Why are
(text too long)
>>6275 >atheism is not a religion I'm aware. At its core, it means a lack of belief in gods. By extension, anything supernatural. Though I suppose if you wanna wrangle semantics, it's possible to be atheist and believe in ghosts. Maybe. Anyway, if our pop culture was not promoting stuff like feminism, multiculturalism, defeatism, etc then I don't see why pop atheists would be on board with lunar worship. I completely agree that the loudest, most spotlit atheists are massive faggots and cookie-cutter libtards. That doesn't mean hardline american evangelicalism is inherently superior. It is also ridiculous, but that doesn't mean we have to choose one or the other.
>I completely agree that the loudest, most spotlit atheists are massive faggots and cookie-cutter libtards. That's not what I was saying. If anything the most spotlit atheists are against the libtards. Hitchens, and Dawkins for example. I don't know much about Sam Harris, but SJWs seem to detest him based on his rationalwiki page. Rationalwiki is, of course, named ironically as it is anything by rational. It's like the left's conservapedia.
>>6275 >but ultimately they aren't. Like, ever? HA And who worships "femininity" really? Transies and Hugh Hefner certainly. I do agree with the basics of your post, but the worst of all semi-religions remains the faith in capitalism
>>6345 >Like, ever? HA Of course some do, I was clearly talking more generally. >And who worships "femininity" really? >Transies and Hugh Hefner certainly. Why even ask the question if your next sentence is going to be agreeing with me? >the worst of all semi-religions remains the faith in capitalism Mind posting a bit more than just that, chum? Why do you see some people treat capitalism semi-religiously? Why is it the worst?
1. Do you participate in politics? AKA voting, rallying, etc. 2. Do you believe you can help change the minds of others and make a change in your country? 3. Sorry, there's no number three. I can't think of one. It looks better than having two questions though. Thread on topic because this is about political affairs (voting, discussion, etc.) I do not expect this thread to get many replies though. It's a narrow topic for a slow board.
>>6292 Too bad Trump supports the NSA.
>>3620 i cannot vote, i have a felony, also i cannot defend myself with a gun if need be, i have a firearms prohibition so all i have to say is fuck the usa, im outta here soon as probation is over, i'll never get work here again, i have an online buisness now and i can do that from anywhere
>>6295 what does it mean??
1. other than occasionally bringing it up with friends or shitposting on the internet, no. I have a job to keep and live in a liberal shithole at an authoritarianly liberal workplace. It's always cool when I can make a micro-connection with someone about our secret naziextremist beliefs. (goddammit I wish Americans used "liberal" correctly) 2. I'm pretty good at rhetoric and avoiding rhetorical traps. You cannot change anyone's mind who doesn't wish to. Cognitive dissonance is real, it's uncomfortable, and few people want to put themselves through discomfort unless you can goad them towards an understanding, or an openness towards, being angry about being lied to and/or screwed. "WAKE UP SHEEPLE" is a meaningless, deragotory phrase. As well as calling someone stupid or ignorant for their beliefs. I dunno. People avoid sunk costs, "defend their honour," defer to authority or childhood, shit like that. I look like Hitler's daughter so maybe I can save Evropa lol.
So anons I live in USA and I don't fully understand how deciding who becomes our president works. So I get people vote but that's for the popular vote but the electoral vote is what decides who's gonna win. Now I know it's the electoral college that does all that but who decides who is in the electoral college, and why is it usually the same states are always the same example California usuallyis a democratic state. So personally I never vote because of this so I was wondering if you chums maybe could help me understand how that whole process works thanks chums
>>6319 short version : America is fifty individual states; the population of each state votes for president, and (generally speaking) the winner of that STATE gets a number of "points". The more heavily populated states are worth more "points", so if the majority of the people of California vote for Mr. Jones, and the majority of people in Colorado vote for Mr. Smith, winning California was worth about 6 times as much. (Refer to the chart that you posted; "CA" is California and "CO" is Colorado.) Using the numbers on your chart (which add up to 540), whoever wins more than 271 "points" wins the race. So it's worth more to focus on panderin to California, New York, Texas, etc., than to the least-populated states.
It's not that hard. Electoral votes are granted based on population. States with more people get more electoral votes. Electoral votes are a winner take all system per state, so if 50.000000001% of people vote for X, X gets 100% of the votes. In order to become president they need 270 out of 538 votes, not just the highest of all candidates. This means that, if for some reason the 538 votes were split rather evenly among 4 people there would be no president. f no candidate receives a majority of Electoral votes, the House of Representatives elects the President from the 3 Presidential candidates who received the most Electoral votes. Each state delegation has one vote. The Senate would elect the Vice President from the 2 Vice Presidential candidates with the most Electoral votes. >why is it usually the same states are always the same example California usuallyis a democratic state I imagine most people are not going to switch parties year-by-year. So if 80% of a state votes X, they are likely to do that next year also. Then you have people who feel like they shouldn't vote because it's unlikely to have any impact regardless, thus further spreading the gap in votes between X and Y. Also possible that people who really hate party X move to another state. After all, if the president is always X then it's likely the governor and other public officials are and if the person really hates the policies introduced by party X, they leave.
>>6326 >>6325 Thanks chum so pretty much our popular vote decides which way the electoral votes will go per state
Local officials (judge, sheriff, alderman, etc) and house reps (congressmen, senators) are directly elected by popular vote. President is elected by electoral college, who are a group of people secretly chosen (names not revealed) who can vote however they want. Historically, they have voted according to popular vote. But they don't have to.
>>6331 derp, should read: congressmen (house of represenatives and senate)
So I know most of you guys dont like feminism at all but what about feminism from this perceptive? Just curious for thoughts. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_T49OZ0BzsA
>>6251 The matter of whether male and female brains are inherently different basically depends on who you believe. Have a look at this, if you want the flip side of that guy's findings: http://cercor.oxfordjournals.org/content/24/10/2721.full.pdf+html
>>6299 >The truth is what you believe! Fuck off with your postmodernism. 2+2 is not 5 if you believe it is, but 4 for someone else who believes that. It's just 4. The guy who believes it is 5 is not "Merely of a different opinion" or some shit, he's fucking wrong. Didn't bother to look at the youtube video, as it seems like a shill, and the .pdf you linked doesn't work without js so don't take this as me saying you're wrong or OP is. If you're going to argue, don't half-ass it and use pussy words like "believe". Otherwise I'll just say "I believe you're wrong" and have just as good of an argument.
>>6302 >Didn't bother to look at the youtube video, as it seems like a shill Protip: Watch these sort of things with VLC and speed up the playback so you waste less of your life.
If we talk actual feminists that want equality, i'm ok against those If we talk about feminazi's (the ones that thing women are still inferior and need more rights even though THEY FUCKING HAVE ALL OF THEM) then...they can go fuck themselves
>>6316 So are you saying women are equal already?
Discover The Network(...).png)Outlander27/1/16(Wed) 02:34 No. 6291OFF TOPIC[View]Database For Undesirables I came across an anti-leftist database yesterday, called http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/ which is linked to FrontPage Magazine and Jihad Watch. Though it is a rather…kosher opposition to the SPLC database, it is useful, and it has a nice comfy layout. It provides info on everybody from George "Soros" Schwartz to Robert De Niro to Mark Potok. I haven't reviewed the database in depth but one thing the anti-leftist database lacks (which the SPLC has) is a large map showing the location of their political enemies. Also, it appears there isn't a list of leftist businesses or lower level activists in the database. Personally, I wish a database would go so far as show the name and home address of every Francois Hollande supporter or Bernie Sanders supporter. Question for /pol/: when are we going to create a new and improved database for our political enemies and where can we maintain it?
How are you ever to know that any of the information is accurate?
>>6315 >How are you ever to know that any of the information is accurate? Verify it with another sauce if it is questionable.
How much longer does Capitalism have left before it's inevitable downfall? Or will violent revolution be the only possible way of removing it, assuming it will happen in the first place?
>>6263 There is no government under communism as well. Socialism is where the workers collectively and democratically own the means of production, wealth is distributed equally and there is no private property. Communism comes about after decades of successful socialism and is a classless, stateless, currency-less society. Come back when you know what different ideologies are kiddo.
>>6264 >can't argue the point >changes subject >ends in another ad hominem Anyway, lets look at >There is no government under communism as well. Okay, so where does this "not payment" money/goods come from? Who does the distributing? Who prevents said distributors from not distributing it and hoarding it? Or just from keeping back some so they get a more equal share? Who prevents me and my buddies from taking our guns, going to some plant or whatever, and saying we own it now. >there will be no guns Who prevents another country from coming in with their guns and saying they own the land and everything on it now? What will happen to criminals? I doubt they will all be killed, so who is going to hold them so they do not continue to commit crime? Or, if they will be killed, who is going to do the killing? How will courts work? Pure jury? Either there will various groups that form to do things, like a distribution group, a military group, a justice group (even pure jury would need some group to decided when proceedings are taking place and decide on the jury), an economic group (at the very least, for basic necessities) or there will be anarchy. In the former case, what you have is really just a government as much as you might try to pretty it up. In the later case, I can't imagine that lasting very long at all as some group would be hungry for power and be able to find people who also want power, and then there would be no centralized force to fight against them.
>>6265 >Okay, so where does this "not payment" money/goods come from? It would be localized for communities. So the food you eat is gonna come from a farm that your society works on. You dont need to do anything to be able to eat this food though, as it's your right to be able to eat and live. As for how it wont get hoarded, there is no real reason to horde essential resources. You can sit there with more food than you can eat and so what? How does that benefit you? Not to mention if you start denying people food, they're not gonna take kindly to that. You can say 'but human nature will cause people to horde anyway' well I will tell you now that human nature isnt real. The way humans behave is dependent on the material conditions they are bought up in. Look at how culture and morality differ in different societies, the same applies for 'human nature'. If all you know are people who have been bought up in a capitalist society, where you are told to look out only for yourself in order to get ahead, are you really surprised that you might consider it 'human nature' when it's the only way you have only ever seen humans act? >there will be no guns Woah, when did I say that? Socialists are all for guns. Otherwise how else is the working class meant to rise up? It also prevents corruption.
All the shit ITT is why I'm a blood and soil Volkisch-type National Socialist. Yes, Volkisch thought can be applied to cities, too. Unfettered capitalism is shit, as witnessed by by the pursuit of runaway capitaliste greed and control worldwide. State-owned banks, with proper checks, issuing currency backed by labour create a powerhouse economy. Communities are strengthened by their independence because of ther reliance on their kith and kin. Public works such as infrastructure creation and maintenance always need to be done. So what if the neighbourhood retard spends their days cleaning parks, sweeping gutters. Is that worthless work? Should we arrest people for taking their community maintenance into their own hands? The environment can be cared for cheaply because it's only sweat paid to recycle trash (which, in our current system, is monetarily more expensive than processing newly-harvested resources) and turn shitty chinese toys into locally-made windmills. Useless shit is no longer made in vast quantities because it's more profitable than work than improves communities. No more supply-demand curve pricing with so much overproduction going to landfills or the ocean. Basically, if we can put 10 people to work doing manual labour instead of replacing them with one machine, and the quality of output is the same, what is the problem? I'm not even getting into third-world mudtrash. They are worthless shits because their genes make them that way, and any commie fuck who knows about their idols like Guevara knows mudskins are a lost cause, and should not be our concern. Let the border guards and military take care of them.
>Eurotunnel has intentionally flooded the area near the tunnel entrance in northern France to keep refugees who try to break into the Channel Tunnel out. https://www.rt.com/news/328763-eurotunnel-flood-refugee-fight/
btw whats happening with this 'off tpoic' thing? have we got a kike \ sjw mod who 'off topics' anything politically incorrect? and why are they lurking instead of posting a justification of their moderation? In my experience mods are silent on justifying their moderation because they know their logic and reasoning is fucked up, and to try post a justification would just expose them are retards.
>>6214 Lurk moar. I haven't noticed any enforcement.
>>6215 will do just that
>>6214 >posting a justification for their moderation Is that really required? All reasons for a thread being moved to Off Topic are detailed in the FAQ, which is clearly accessible at the top of the page. Threads that pose no real discussion (i.e, circlejerks), or aren't backed up by evidence are moved to Off Topic, which creates a notice at the top of the thread. This person has chosen to place their thread in Off Topic; no moderation action has been done to it. Feel free to expose me as a retard.
Maria Eugenia Vidal. Is she the cutest politician in the world?
She's pretty, however not as pretty as Natalia Poklonskaya. I voted for her and I'm so glad she won the election <3 I cannot say the same about her daughters though
